The Gauteng High Court has ordered the demolition of a multi-storey building in Proclamation Hill, Pretoria West, ruling in favour of the City of Tshwane in a dispute over alleged illegal construction linked to property developer George Asaba.
The judgment, announced on 25 May 2026, grants the municipality a final interdict, an eviction order, and a demolition order for the property at 47 Arcadia Avenue.
According to court papers and a statement issued by the City, the building was allegedly constructed without approved plans and in contravention of zoning regulations, which permit only a single dwelling on the site.
The municipality further alleges that multiple stop-construction notices were issued during construction, but construction continued despite the warnings.
MMC for Corporate and Shared Services Cllr Flora Monama said the ruling reinforces the City’s authority to act against unlawful developments.
“The judgment sends an unambiguous message to rogue developers that the City will enforce the rule of law and demolish illegal structures,” she said.
However, the ruling has drawn mixed reactions from residents in Pretoria West, particularly those concerned about the impact on tenants.
Community member Sarah Mokoena said illegal developments have raised safety concerns in the area.
“These buildings are overcrowded, and sometimes you can see unsafe electricity connections everywhere. People are worried about fires and crime,” she said.
Others have questioned what will happen to families living in the building.
“Many people staying there are just trying to find affordable places to live. The City must make sure innocent families are not left homeless,” said Terrence Maluleke.
One resident living in the building said the eviction order has left her fearing for her children’s future.
“I do not know where my children and I will go if we are forced to leave. This has been our home for many years. I fear for my children and myself. We do not want to end up on the streets,” she said.
It remains unclear when the demolition will take place, what alternative accommodation, if any, will be provided to affected tenants, and whether the developer intends to challenge the ruling.
Attempts to obtain additional comment from the City and from Asaba were unsuccessful at the time of publication.
